On Wednesday, California Governor Gavin Newsom enacted legislation designed to shield workers from the impacts of artificial intelligence, particularly regarding job security and monitoring in the workplace.
The new laws prohibit employers from utilizing AI to assess a worker's emotional state via biometric data, mandate that employers inform employees in writing when AI is the catalyst for mass layoffs, and ban the use of AI as a deciding factor in termination decisions.
Newsom also issued an executive order stipulating that state agencies refer to the technology as "artificial intelligence," as opposed to the term "super intelligence," which former President Donald Trump has recently suggested for U.S. diplomats to adopt.
"AI should create opportunities rather than jeopardize the livelihoods of workers and their families," Newsom asserted in a statement. He criticized Trump during a lengthy press conference for failing to introduce comprehensive federal AI regulations, especially as industry leaders voice concerns regarding the technology's inherent risks. Trump had previously mentioned that major tech executives signed a voluntary agreement to self-regulate AI development.
Earlier this month, Newsom approved legislation requiring AI chatbot developers to conduct risk assessments prior to deployment, alongside an executive order for the state to consult with experts to enhance industry oversight.
"In the absence of federal guidance, we must take significant steps," Newsom remarked, hinting at the possibility of convening lawmakers for a special session to further address these challenges.
This press event marked the final day for Newsom to either sign or veto bills before he leaves office in January. It occurred just weeks before the midterm elections, which will be pivotal in determining Congressional power dynamics.
Newsom has been proactive in the political arena, having spearheaded efforts last year to redraw district lines to bolster Democratic prospects for gaining House seats. He has consistently emphasized the critical nature of these elections, stating, "There will not be a free and fair election in 2028 unless we take back the House of Representatives."
When questioned about a timeline for making a decision on a potential 2028 presidential run, Newsom was non-committal, saying, "that moment will arrive when it arrives."
Former Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris, also from the San Francisco Bay Area, has indicated she is contemplating a 2028 campaign. Newsom previously told CNN he would abstain from running if she entered the race, and noted that they haven't discussed the matter since that interview.
Newsom also addressed a proposed temporary tax increase on billionaires that will be featured on the November ballot, a measure he has stood against. He acknowledged the supporters of the initiative, including Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, who advocate for reducing income inequality in the U.S. "He’s absolutely correct about the disparities between the wealthy and the underprivileged," Newsom said, "but we hold fundamentally opposing views on this issue."
His comments were timed shortly before a gubernatorial debate between Democrat Xavier Becerra and Republican Steve Hilton. When asked if he would watch the debate, Newsom simply replied, "No."
