When it comes to online advertisements, how pertinent do you find this particular ad to your interests? 

Some common issues users experience include: the video player taking too long to load the content, the video itself failing to load, the ad freezing or not completing its loading process, video content not playing after the advertisement, audio that is excessively loud on the ad, as well as various other technical difficulties.

Investors prepare for instability in the tech sector due to AI worries.

Dark, stormy trading floor lit by warm tungsten spotlights. Silhouetted investors in suits clutch briefcases and lean forward, eyes fixed on a swirling, ember-glow AI brain made of code and electric sparks overhead. Jagged red and orange stock chart lines flicker on screens and walls, casting long shadows that emphasize the tension and looming tech-sector turbulence.

Investors brace for tech sector turbulence amid AI concerns - CNN

- Users reported slow loading times for video content and ads.  
- Many experienced ads that froze or did not finish loading.  
- Audio levels on ads were deemed excessively loud by some viewers.  

1. How relevant is this ad to you?

Video player was slow to load content Video content never loaded Ad froze or did not finish loading Video content did not start after ad Audio on ad was too loud Other issues

Investors brace for tech sector turbulence amid AI concerns

How pertinent is this advertisement to you? 

The video player experienced slow content loading, while some video content failed to load entirely. At times, the ad either froze or did not complete its loading process. Additionally, there were instances where the video content failed to play after the advertisement ran, and the audio from the ad was excessively loud. Other problems were also encountered.

US advocates for AI regulations as China considers security concerns.

A dimly lit high-level conference room under warm amber lights: on the left, a large U.S. flag behind officials bolting a half-built steel barrier engraved “AI Guardrails”; across a polished mahogany table, a solitary silhouette of a Chinese official studies a softly glowing padlock icon on a tablet. Tension fills the shadows.

US pushes AI guardrails as China weighs security risks - CNN

- Users experienced slow loading times for video players and ads.  
- Ads frequently froze or did not complete loading properly.  
- Audio levels on ads were reported as being excessively loud.  

US pushes AI guardrails as China weighs security risks

Producers of PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) are ramping up their manufacturing efforts in response to heightened demand from the artificial intelligence sector, raising alarms among environmental activists. Despite significant concerns surrounding these "forever chemicals," which have been associated with serious health risks including cancer, a survey of the top ten manufacturers reveals that nearly all are planning to boost production.

Many companies justify their expansions by highlighting the role of PFAS in semiconductor production and advanced cooling systems for data centers, which are essential for powering AI technologies. However, critics warn that this surge in production threatens to counteract initial regulatory efforts to limit PFAS usage across Europe, the UK, and various areas of the US.

Anne-Sofie Bäckar, executive director of ChemSec, a Swedish NGO focused on chemical safety, emphasized the urgency of the situation, stating that increased production could lead to a widespread proliferation of these harmful substances unless governments impose stringent regulations. 

The ChemSec survey indicates that most of the key PFAS manufacturers, including major firms in Europe, Asia, and North America, are planning to expand their production capabilities. The rapid growth of AI technologies is a significant driver of this demand, particularly for cooling systems that are marketed as environmentally friendly and for various phases of semiconductor manufacturing processes.

Japanese company Daikin is poised to establish a new "data center hub" to cater to this demand, committing to enhance its market share through both existing fluorine products and new innovations. Meanwhile, France’s Arkema is investing in a $60 million production unit in Kentucky to support the expanding cooling requirements of data centers. U.S.-based Chemours is also scaling up operations to address the needs of advanced data centers and AI hardware, promoting its liquid cooling solutions as energy-efficient options that reduce overall operational costs.

Despite Chemours’ expansion plans, critics argue that the company has downplayed the environmental and health risks associated with PFAS, especially following a hefty $450 million settlement over contaminations.

Other producers increasing their output include Japan's AGC, China's Dongyue, India's Gujarat Fluorochemicals, Russia’s HaloPolymer, Mexico's Orbia Fluor & Energy Materials, U.S. firm Solstice, and Belgium's Syensqo. Gujarat Fluorochemicals' CEO highlighted the significant growth potential in sectors including lithium-ion batteries, used in electric vehicles, laptops, and smartphones, alongside a booming demand for data centers and semiconductors.

Notably, the Swiss company Archroma plans to transition towards offering PFAS-free alternatives. Similarly, the German giant BASF has announced its intention to phase out PFAS production by 2028.

PFAS are increasingly utilized in innovative cooling systems for data centers, promised to be both water- and energy-efficient. In a two-phase immersion cooling setup, servers are submerged in a low-boiling PFAS fluid, which captures heat as it vaporizes and then condenses back into liquid form, ensuring continuous cooling.

The significance of PFAS in semiconductor fabrication is underscored by a recent note from Danske Bank, stating these substances are critical to many stages of chip production. However, analysts caution that the rising dependence on PFAS presents "hidden risks" associated with potential high costs for cleanup and litigation.

The robust carbon-fluorine bonds found in PFAS render them resistant to breakdown, making them valuable for various industrial applications, yet they are virtually indestructible in natural environments. Consequently, they persist in ecosystems and can accumulate in air, water, and soil, leading to toxic levels in the food chain.

Though PFAS have only been around for a relatively short time, their environmental accumulation has already surpassed safe limits, with scientists indicating that traces of these chemicals may be present in the blood of nearly every person alive today. Research suggests links to a range of health issues, including cancer and kidney disease.

In a bid to raise awareness, ChemSec has sent blood-testing kits to CEOs of the leading European PFAS manufacturers, encouraging them to test for and disclose PFAS levels in their own blood. Bäckar remarked that those in leadership must recognize that they too are susceptible to the toxins they produce, as studies have found PFAS in the blood of over 99% of the global population.

Campaigners caution of a 'tidal wave' of PFAS being introduced to meet AI industry's demands.

Dark stormy seascape at dusk, an enormous toxic-green wave roiling toward a silhouetted AI chip factory on the shore. The foam carries faint molecular diagrams labeled “PFAS.” In the background, shadowy industrial buildings and smokestacks loom beneath heavy, brooding clouds—an ominous scene of environmental peril.

‘Tidal wave’ of Pfas being launched to satisfy AI industry, campaigners warn - The Guardian

- Companies are increasing PFAS production to meet growing demands from the AI industry.  
- PFAS are linked to severe health risks and pose environmental contamination challenges.  
- Critics warn production expansion risks undermining regulatory efforts to control PFAS usage.  

Pfas companies are launching a “tidal wave” of forever chemicals production to meet demand from the AI industry, a campaign organisation has warned.

Despite alarm over the chemicals, which have been linked to cancer, a survey of the 10 biggest manufacturers found most had plans to increase production.

Many frame their investments around the “AI revolution”, because of the role Pfas play in semiconductor production and next-generation datacentre cooling systems.

But opponents warn that the chemicals, which never degrade in nature, are a ticking timebomb for human and planetary health. They say increased production risks undermining nascent moves to restrict Pfas in Europe, the UK and parts of the US.

“These companies’ expansion plans show that unless governments and regulators insist on a rapid phaseout, we will face a new tidal wave of forever chemicals,” said Anne-Sofie Bäckar, the executive director of ChemSec, the Swedish chemicals watchdog that carried out the research.

ChemSec’s survey found nearly all of the 10 biggest manufacturers of Pfas had plans to increase production, at sites in Europe, Asia and North America.

The boom in AI tech was leading demand, with Pfas used for “eco-friendly” datacentre cooling and in various stages of semiconductor manufacturing.

Japan-headquarted Daikin said it was launching a “datacentre hub” to meet demand, and promised to “maintain and expand our top share in the industry by expanding sales of existing fluorine products and introducing new products”.

The French multinational Arkema was expanding its refrigerant offering, with a new $60m (£44m) production unit in Kentucky that it said “will enable us to follow the rapid expansion of datacenters’ cooling needs”.

And the US Pfas producer Chemours was expanding to meet demand from “advanced datacenters and AI hardware”. It said its “innovative liquid cooling solutions” lower the energy, water, space, maintenance and investment costs of datacentres.

Critics have said Chemours – recently ordered to pay $450m to settle a lawsuit over Pfas discharges – downplays the chemicals’ toxicity and climate impact.

Other companies increasing production were Japanese multinational AGC, Chinese conglomerate Dongyue, India-based chemicals giant Gujarat Fluorochemicals, secretive Russian Pfas producer HaloPolymer, Mexico’s Orbia Fluor & Energy Materials, US-based fluorinated gases producer Solstice and Belgian multinational Syensqo.

Producers also cited Pfas coatings and binders for lithium-ion batteries, used in EVs, laptops and phones, as a parallel growth area. Gujarat Fluorochemicals’ chief executive, Bir Kapoor, recently identified batteries as one of several “sunrise sectors”, alongside datacentres, semiconductors and green hydrogen. “There is a tremendous growth opportunity there,” he said.

The only clear exceptions were the Swiss company Archroma, which was switching to marketing Pfas-free alternatives, and the German giant BASF, which has said it will exit Pfas production by 2028.

skip past newsletter promotion Free newsletter | Weekly Sign up to Down to Earth The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential Enter your email Sign up after newsletter promotion

Pfas are used for a new form of datacentre cooling touted as more water- and energy-efficient. In “two-phase immersion cooling” systems, servers are immersed in a pool of Pfas with a low boiling point. As the hardware gets hot, the fluid boils, drawing heat away as vapour. That rises to a water-cooled condensing coil at the top of the tank, cools back to a liquid state and re-enters the cycle.

Pfas also play a crucial role in the fabrication process for semiconductors, another sector booming to meet demand from the AI industry.

According to a recent investor note from Danske Bank: “In the world of microchips, these ‘forever chemicals’ are not merely peripheral additives; they are essential ingredients integrated into as many as 1,000 distinct steps at the nanometric level.”

But analysts also warned Pfas were “the hidden risk of the AI boom” with “escalating potential for multibillion-euro remediation and litigation liabilities”.

The carbon-fluorine bonds in Pfas, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are among the strongest in organic chemistry, rendering them incredibly resistant to heat, water and corrosion.

That makes them useful for a range of industrial processes and consumer products. But it also makes them virtually indestructible in the natural environment. As a result, they continue to be recycled through planetary systems, leading to their accumulation in air, water and soil, and up the food chain.

Although Pfas have existed for less than a century, scientists have warned that their accumulation in the environment has already breached a planetary boundary.

Already the chemicals are thought to contaminate the blood of nearly every living person. Research links them to cancer, liver disease, kidney issues, high cholesterol and birth defects.

ChemSec sent finger-prick blood tests to the chief executives of all the European companies in its top 10, encouraging them to test Pfas levels in their own blood and share the results publicly.

“The people who lead them must understand that they too are affected by the toxins they produce, which have been detected in the blood of more than 99% of people worldwide,” said Bäckar.

‘Tidal wave’ of Pfas being launched to satisfy AI industry, campaigners warn

In an era where threats to public safety often mobilize swift government action, an alarming trend has emerged from the artificial intelligence sector, yet it has largely been met with indifference from Republican leaders in Washington. Executives from AI companies have raised urgent alarms regarding the potential risks of their technology surpassing human control, yet their warnings have been downplayed by figures such as former President Donald Trump, who characterized concerns as overblown fearmongering.

Trump expressed skepticism about the risks posed by AI, suggesting that negative forces are inflating the issue and that proposals for emergency legislation would be unwarranted. House Speaker Mike Johnson echoed this sentiment, stating that the driving forces behind AI innovation could decelerate voluntarily, but asserted that Congress should not rush into regulatory measures. Both leaders framed the discussion around AI as less about safety and more about national security, cautioning that any slowdown in U.S. AI development could result in a competitive advantage for China.

This Republican stance stands in stark contrast to increasing apprehensions voiced by prominent Democrats. Key figures, including former President Barack Obama, have highlighted the necessity of implementing regulatory measures to prevent a perilous leap into unregulated AI advancements.

As concerns surrounding AI gather momentum, they have emerged as a pivotal topic in upcoming elections. Political candidates across the aisle are tapping into public concern over the rapid expansion of AI infrastructure. Many are advocating for moratoriums on constructing large data centers that consume vast resources and contribute to rising utility costs amid a growing affordability crisis—currently the leading issue for voters.

Interestingly, even as more Americans utilize AI technology, a recent NBC News survey indicated that 70% of respondents expressed more worry than excitement regarding AI. The narrative has shifted; fears of widespread job losses and heightened utility costs have intensified public disdain towards AI developments, potentially galvanizing a movement against the excessive power wielded by tech elites. Additionally, concerns about the potential misuse of AI by hostile powers reflect broader national security implications that could resonate through future political landscapes.

With the political atmosphere shifting rapidly, the implications of AI policy are likely to feature prominently in both the midterm races and the 2028 presidential election. Democrats are poised to harness the current political wave to foster significant change, particularly if they regain control of either chamber of Congress. For Republicans, Trump’s apparent disinterest in AI concerns could exacerbate electoral vulnerabilities, making the issue more critical than ever.

The urgency of the AI debate escalated following comments from key industry leaders. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei recently stated that there is a necessity for the AI sector to slow its pace of development. In a forthcoming interview with CNN, Amodei urged AI executives to collaborate to avert potential harm to humanity. Sam Altman, head of OpenAI, supported this call for caution and recommended that independent evaluators be integrated into AI companies for oversight. The chorus of warnings was further amplified by prominent voices, including Elon Musk and Demis Hassabis from Google’s DeepMind, who echoed concerns about the risks of rapidly advancing AI.

These conflicting reactions to the growing alarms underscore a broader ideological divide in Washington regarding the potential hazards posed by AI. Skeptics of the existential threats believe that AI leaders are exaggerating risks for self-serving reasons, reflecting a skepticism that has characterized technological advancements since the Industrial Revolution. Meanwhile, a laissez-faire attitude towards regulation rooted in the Trump administration's philosophy complicates the discourse, with concerns that curbing AI could destabilize a burgeoning industry critical to economic growth.

However, a significant bipartisan apprehension about the regulation of AI is emerging. Prominent voices from both sides of the aisle—including Texas Senator Ted Cruz and independent Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders—have advocated for more robust regulations in the sector. Sanders has even proposed legislation to impose a moratorium on the development of superintelligent AI until it can be properly regulated.

As the midterms approach, Democrats are seizing the opportunity to advocate for stricter measures on AI development. Democratic House leader Hakeem Jeffries has called for swift action to slow AI growth, indicating a willingness to convene a strategy session to address this pressing issue. Senator Ruben Gallego highlighted the potential dangers of unregulated AI by drawing an alarming parallel to nuclear weapons and their decision-making capabilities.

While some experts argue that such scenarios may exaggerate AI’s current capabilities, they may not mitigate the growing public concern that could influence political outcomes. Whether humanity or AI will control the future seems poised to become a defining question of this political season, one that could affect the trajectory of policies and governance in the United States for years to come.

A pivotal moment for humanity and AI may reshape American politics.

A dramatic twilight scene on the steps of the U.S. Capitol: a colossal marble bust stands guard, its left side a human face and its right side etched with glowing copper circuitry. Dark storm clouds swirl overhead, a single American flag billows beside the statue, and a shaft of dying sunlight pierces the clouds—symbolizing a fateful crossroads between humanity and AI redefining American politics.

A fateful turning point for humanity and AI could redefine American politics - CNN

- AI leaders warn of potential threats, but Republicans prioritize national security over regulation.  
- Public concern over AI rises amid fears of job loss and billionaire power.  
- Democrats call for immediate action on AI regulation ahead of midterm elections.  

If a terrorist threat led subject experts to warn of a near-term existential menace to humanity, the weight of the US government would mobilize in an immediate and limitless effort to save the day.

Yet a remarkable sequence of warnings by leaders of artificial intelligence firms that their creation may soon outpace humans’ capacity to control it has so far been met with a shrug by Republicans who run Washington.

President Donald Trump said Sunday that “negative forces” were conjuring up “things that won’t happen.” House Speaker Mike Johnson rejected a call to pass emergency legislation, telling CNN’s Jake Tapper that AI executives “pushing the frontier” could slow down if they wanted, but Congress shouldn’t rush to act.

Both men also warned that slowing the US AI industry would hand the advantage in the superintelligence race to China — casting the debate less as one of safety and more as a national security question.

Republican inertia contrasts with growing warnings from key Democrats, including former president Barack Obama, that without a government-mandated brake on the technology, the world would cross a “dangerous” threshold.

A political turning point

The crescendo of concern — especially since it is coming from titans of the AI industry itself — feels like a political watershed moment.

AI has been an increasingly keen issue in the midterm elections. Candidates of both parties have tapped into public anger over AI infrastructure, calling for construction moratoriums on the vast, unsightly data centers that are ravenous for power and water.

But hostility toward AI is also evolving into a catchall that crystalizes a moment of public anger and anxiety on disparate issues.

While increasing numbers of Americans are using the technology, an NBC News poll this month found that 70% of respondents were more worried than excited by AI.

An aerial view of the construction site of the Stargate Oracle AI data center on August 26, 2026 in Abilene, Texas. Brandon Bell/Getty Images

AI is fueling fears of massive job losses at a moment when polls show a majority of citizens have lost confidence in the Trump economy. Higher utility bills, and the perception that data centers are to blame, are deepening the affordability crisis — the No. 1 issue this election season. Scary AI scenarios could solidify Americans’ worries over the power held by a few billionaire tech oligarchs who risk creating dangerous new societal tensions. And the possibility that China or other non-state actors could exploit AI advances to threaten the US do add up to a genuine national security conundrum with important political implications for years to come.

This swiftly evolving political environment may make AI an even more potent issue in the midterms and the 2028 presidential election. Democrats will hope to whip up the kind of political energy that could redefine races and push momentum for change, especially if they win back the House or Senate. Republicans, fearing a backlash to Trump’s second term, hardly need another issue where he seems indifferent to public perceptions.

Why AI is such a divisive political issue

AI politics erupted to a new level in the last week.

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei wrote on Saturday that the industry needed to be slowed down. In an exclusive interview with CNN’s Anderson Cooper, which is due to air in full Monday, he called on AI leaders to work together to keep the technology from harming humanity.

On Saturday, Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, posted on X that he agreed with Amodei, and called for “independent evaluators” embedded in AI firms. Elon Musk, whose xAI company powers the chatbot Grok, wrote “Dario is right” on X. Google’s DeepMind chair Demis Hassabis added his voice to the chorus. All this followed a stunning warning by AI researcher Jacob Coxon that “the people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade.”

Sharply different reactions to the extraordinary set of alarms reflect more than Washington’s polarization; they reveal a fractured consensus about whether AI indeed poses a threat to humanity.

Video Ad Feedback Former Anthropic researcher warns AI could ‘kill us all’ Former AI researcher Jacob Coxon tells CNN’s Anderson Cooper why he quit Anthropic over fears that rapidly advancing AI could become impossible to control. 2:28 • Source: CNN Former Anthropic researcher warns AI could ‘kill us all’ 2:28

Critics worry computerized agents could become so powerful that they could conspire to destroy the world. Skeptics dismiss doom-laden cautions. They accuse tech moguls of hyping their own products. And fearmongering has accompanied technology breakthroughs since the Industrial Revolution.

There’s also an ideological angle to the controversy because of the Trump administration’s instinct for minimal regulation, which doesn’t distinguish between traditional industries and a far more powerful AI sector.

Trump also has strong personal and political incentives to oppose a slow-down.

The AI industry is a giant growth engine and he cannot afford for the bubble to burst and worsen his political standing. And his critics will wonder whether personal investments in the digital economy by administration officials will interfere with their capacity to fairly oversee the AI industry.

There’s another problem

Lightning-fast breakthroughs in a sector that is complex and opaque means AI is not just emulating the historic pattern of new technology outpacing the capacity of governments to regulate. It’s not clear that leaders who’d be needed to act even fully understand its properties and possible threats.

And Trump makes a fair point when he warns that the US would be ceding a military edge to its superpower rival if it fell behind in AI. “We’re leading China in AI. We’re the most sophisticated country in the world, and frankly, I want to keep it that way,” he told reporters Sunday.

Other administration officials warn against unilateral US disarmament in AI. Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, said on “State of the Union” that the “far bigger risk” was that “a malevolent actor” with designs on bioweapons could use “an AI that is better than the one we have to protect us.”

Constraining AI for humanity’s benefit would take an international agreement. But this would require the kind of pooled sovereignty Trump disdains and contradict the administration’s principle that every aspect of America’s power must be deployed to strengthen unilateral dominance.

And would foreign authoritarians or non-state actors play by the new rules?

Still, autonomous computer agents wouldn’t only threaten democracies. They’d also challenge the core governing principle of China’s Communist Party — the use of state power to impose national stability. Trump is scheduled to have a Washington summit with President Xi Jinping this month, which both men could use to carve out a global leadership position.

Trump’s nonchalance may understate the problem

But Trump’s attitude toward cataclysmic warnings of rampant AI suggests he’s done little philosophical soul-searching at a turning point for the human race. “I’m not downplaying, but, you know, it’s going to be more good than bad by a lot,” Trump told reporters on Air Force One Sunday.

“It’s going to be fine,” the president told GB News last week. “We’ll always have something to stop them. We’ll have a little gear. Boom.”

Trump’s blasé approach recalls his cavalier response to Covid-19 — which thwarted his political and economic priorities. He once suggested that the country would have fewer confirmed cases of the virus if it simply stopped testing.

US President Trump gestures as CEO of Open AI Sam Altman speaks in the Roosevelt Room at the White House on January 21, 2025, in Washington, DC. Jim Watson/AFP/Getty Images

A laissez-faire attitude defines his administration. David Sacks, co-chair of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, wrote on X Saturday that AI leaders should take responsibility for their industry. “Stop pretending you need anyone else’s permission.”

Still, there’s significant bipartisan concern. Texas GOP Sen. Ted Cruz said that “we need substantially more regulation when it comes to AI,” in an interview with Politico last week. Independent Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders has proposed a bill to permanently ban superintelligent AI and temporarily pause advanced AI development pending federal regulation. Sen. Josh Hawley, Republican of Missouri, last week launched a probe into OpenAI over a rogue attack by its AI agents on another firm, Hugging Face, in July.

Democrats spot a political opening

But senior Democrats are pushing for a much faster government response as they position for November’s midterms.

Democratic House leader Hakeem Jeffries said on ABC News’ “This Week” Sunday that Congress should take “decisive action” to slow down AI development and pledged that Democrats would meet to agree to a plan this week.

Democratic Sen. Ruben Gallego warned: “When we created a nuclear weapon, the nuclear weapon did not have the decisionmaking power to drop a nuclear weapon. AI has the capability and will have the capability to make decisions like that.”

“This is more akin to Dr. Frankenstein telling us, ‘The monster is loose, help me stop the monster,’” the Arizona lawmaker said on “State of the Union.”

Some AI experts believe such scenarios overstate the capacity of AI. But that may not matter from a political perspective if public anxiety grows.

Trump may not like it, but this question now seems critical to the midterms and American politics more generally: Who controls AI — humanity or machines?

A fateful turning point for humanity and AI could redefine American politics

Shares of the Chinese artificial intelligence firm Z.ai experienced a decline of over 10% on Monday following the announcement of plans to secure approximately $5 billion through a combination of a new share issuance and convertible bond offering. This fundraising initiative marks the company’s second significant capital raise within the span of just two months.

Based in Beijing, Z.ai intends to issue up to 21.97 million new shares priced at HK$714 each, which would generate about HK$15.68 billion (around $2 billion) in total revenue. This placement price reflects a 10% reduction compared to Z.ai's closing price of HK$793 from the previous Friday.

In addition, the company is set to issue zero-coupon convertible bonds worth 20.14 billion yuan (approximately $3 billion), which will mature in 2027. These bonds will have a conversion price of HK$892.50 per share, representing a 12.5% premium over Friday’s closing figure.

Z.ai indicated that the funds raised will be allocated towards advancing its next-generation AI models, with investments in research and development, training and inference systems, as well as commercialization efforts.

This latest fundraising round follows closely on the heels of a significant capital increase in July, where Z.ai successfully raised around $4 billion through a previous share placement.

The company’s shares had recently surged when it revealed a new AI model designed to operate completely on chips produced in China, utilizing 100,000 domestically manufactured chips for processing online requests.

Meanwhile, Z.ai's domestic competitor, MiniMax, also saw its stock decline, dropping by approximately 5% on the same day.

Z.ai stock falls by more than 10% following $5 billion fundraising, marking its second significant capital raise in two months.

A dimly lit trading floor at night, dominated by a giant Z.ai logo on a curved LED ticker showing “–10%” in bold red next to “$5 B Raised,” anxious silhouettes of traders staring at the plunging share chart, rain-streaked glass windows overlooking a stormy city skyline, dark thematic lighting

Z.ai shares tumble over 10% after $5 billion fundraising, its second major raise in two months - CNBC

- Z.ai's shares dropped over 10% after announcing a $5 billion fundraising effort.  
- The company plans to issue new shares and convertible bonds to support AI development.  
- This follows a previous $4 billion fundraising just two months prior in July.

Information on Zhipu's AI service on the web, dubbed Z.ai, arranged on a computer in Shanghai, Jan. 7, 2026.

Shares of Chinese artificial intelligence company Z.ai tumbled more than 10% on Monday after the company announced plans to raise about $5 billion through a new share placement and convertible bond sale, marking its second major fundraising in two months.

The Beijing-based company plans to issue up to 21.97 million new shares at HK$714 each, raising gross proceeds of about HK$15.68 billion ($2 billion). The placement price represents a 10% discount to Z.ai's Friday closing price of HK$793.

Separately, Z.ai plans to issue 20.14 billion yuan ($3 billion) in zero-coupon convertible bonds due in 2027. The bonds will initially be convertible at HK$892.50 per share, a 12.5% premium to Friday's closing price.

The company said proceeds from the fundraising will support the development of its next-generation AI models, including research and development, training and inference infrastructure, and commercialization.

The latest fundraising comes just two months after Z.ai raised about $4 billion through a share placement in July.

Last month, Z.ai shares jumped after the company launched a new AI model that it said runs entirely on Chinese-made chips. The company claimed it used 100,000 domestically made chips to handle online requests for the model.

Shares of its domestic rival MiniMax were also down, falling about 5% on Monday.

— CNBC's Evelyn Cheng contributed to this report





Z.ai shares tumble over 10% after $5 billion fundraising, its second major raise in two months

During a press briefing at his golf resort in Doonbeg, Ireland on Sunday, President Trump dismissed the escalating concerns surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) and the recent calls from tech industry leaders for a slowdown in its development. He characterized the warnings about potential AI dangers as exaggerated, suggesting that "negative forces" are amplifying fears that are unfounded.

Trump asserted, "We are at the forefront of AI, outperforming China, and I intend to maintain that edge. The race for AI supremacy is crucial; whoever excels in this area wins." He expressed confidence in the ability to implement safety measures while rejecting the notion that the concerns warranted the emphasis they have received.

The president did not elaborate on the "negative forces" he referred to.

On CNN's State of the Union, House Speaker Mike Johnson echoed Trump’s sentiments, stating that imposing a moratorium on AI advancements could allow China to catch up. Instead, he advocated for tech companies to spearhead efforts for safer AI applications. "If Congress rushes to impose regulations on AI, we risk falling behind China, which poses a significant threat to every American. We need a balanced approach and steady leadership," Johnson warned.

These remarks come in the wake of an essay published by Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, who urged a pause in AI capability enhancements, highlighting the risk of humans losing control over AI systems, as well as the potential misuse of AI in cyberattacks and bioterrorism. Amodei emphasized the necessity for global collaboration in AI development and suggested that organizations incorporate independent evaluators to monitor incidents and safety protocols, announcing that Anthropic would individually adopt these measures.

Prominent tech figures Elon Musk and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman concurred with Amodei's viewpoint over social media, with Altman revealing in a Fortune Magazine interview that OpenAI would postpone its public offering until at least 2027 due to safety concerns and that they are contemplating halting tests on their technologies to ensure greater security.

David Sacks, co-chair of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, responded to their statements on social media, advocating for responsible choices. "If the unreleased algorithms are concerning enough for you to consider a slowdown, I support that decision," he remarked, adding that tech leaders should not rely on external approval to take such measures. Sacks further cautioned against the notion that their motivations for a slowdown were purely altruistic, pointing out the significant liability risks associated with product-related damages from catastrophic cyber incidents.

This coverage includes contributions from NPR reporter Shannon Bond.

Trump minimizes demands for a pause on AI development

A shadowy press briefing hall at dusk, a warm spotlight illuminating a podium where Donald Trump in a dark suit shrugs dismissively to a sea of silhouetted reporters. Behind him, a giant “AI Speedometer” gauge glows deep red in the high-velocity zone. Two uneasy aides clutch folders labeled “Slow AI,” and a lone American flag stands quietly to one side.

Trump downplays calls for AI slowdown - NPR

- Trump dismissed AI concerns as exaggerated and emphasized America's leadership in AI technology.  
- House Speaker Johnson warned against a moratorium, stating it could enable China's progress.  
- Tech leaders, including Musk and Altman, support calls for caution and safety in AI development.

Trump downplays calls for AI slowdown

toggle caption Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP

President Trump on Sunday downplayed concerns that AI could go rogue after several leaders in the tech industry called for putting the brakes on its development.

Speaking to reporters at his Doonbeg golf resort in Ireland, the president said the dire warnings about AI were exaggerated and that "negative forces" are making claims about things that won't happen.

"We're leading China in AI, we're the most sophisticated country in the world, and frankly, I want to keep it that way because whoever wins AI, wins," Trump said. "And we can put guardrails, we can do this and that. But I think you have a lot of negative forces that are bringing it up that shouldn't be bringing it up."

Sponsor Message

President Trump did not explain what he meant by "negative forces."

During an interview on CNN's State of the Union on Sunday, House Speaker Mike Johnson said there should not be a moratorium on the technology because "China will overlap us." Instead, Johnson said he would like for tech companies to take the lead creating safer AI.

"If Congress just races in and does some sort of emergency session to try to regulate AI, we will lose the race to China," the House Speaker said. "And that is a threat to every single American. So, we've got to have balance. We got to have steady hands at the wheel."

Trump's and Johnson's comments follow warnings from Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, who posted an essay online Saturday, calling for companies and governments to slow down how fast the capabilities of AI are improved. Amodei warned that humans can lose control of AI systems and there are also opportunities to use AI in cyberattacks and bioterrorism.

Amodei wrote that there should be international cooperation around AI development and that labs should embed third-party evaluators to report incidents and track safety practices. He said Anthropic would take those steps unilaterally.

On Saturday, tech leaders Elon Musk and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman both said in social media posts that they agree with Amodei's concerns. Altman also told Fortune Magazine in an interview released Saturday that he would delay OpenAI going public until at least 2027 because of safety concerns and that company officials have discussed pausing tests on the technology to make it safer.

Sponsor Message

David Sacks, co-chair of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, responded to Altman and Amodei on social media writing "go ahead."

"I don't see what you see in the lab," Sacks wrote on X on Sunday. "If the unreleased models are scary enough that you think you should slow down, I support your decision to be responsible."

But Sacks admonished tech leaders to "stop pretending you need anyone else's permission" to make such moves.

"Most of all, stop pretending the motivation to slow down is purely altruistic," he wrote. "You face massive product-liability exposure if your products enable a truly damaging cyberattack."

NPR's Shannon Bond contributed to this report.



Trump downplays calls for AI slowdown

On the trading floor of the New York Stock Exchange's NYSE American (AMEX) in New York City, activity was brisk on the evening of September 8, 2026, as stock futures took a downturn. Investors were attentive to significant developments in the artificial intelligence (AI) sector, especially concerning initial public offerings (IPOs) amidst increasing safety apprehensions, alongside the latest fluctuations in oil prices.

Futures for the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped by 179 points, equating to a decrease of 0.4%. Meanwhile, S&P 500 futures experienced a decline of 0.6%, and Nasdaq-100 futures saw a notable fall of 1.2%.

In a recent interview released on Saturday, Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, declared that the company would postpone its IPO plans, indicating that going public this year is now considered "ill-advised." This statement comes just a month after OpenAI's CFO, Sarah Friar, projected a public offering by 2027 at the latest.

Dario Amodei, the CEO of competitor Anthropic, echoed similar sentiments in an essay published on Saturday, asserting that AI firms must pause the rapid advancement of their leading models due to safety concerns. In a conversation with CBS News on Sunday, Amodei highlighted the "toughest dilemma" surrounding such a strategy—whether China would also adhere to this slowdown.

The surge in AI advancements has propelled the stock market to unprecedented levels, driving substantial corporate investments in technological infrastructure over the past few years. However, the recent news may suggest that the anticipated positive effects on public markets, linked to enhanced efficiency and anticipated major IPOs, might not be as certain as previously thought.

Stock futures decline as investors consider AI safety issues, oil prices rise: Live updates

In a dim, tense trading floor lit by a single overhead lamp, an antique brass balance scale sits center stage: on one pan, a glowing AI microchip etched with a hazard symbol; on the other, a lustrous oil barrel tipping the scale. Behind, a giant digital ticker in deep reds scrolls “Futures ▼,” and shadowy investors in suits watch anxiously from the edges, their reflections fractured across dark glass walls.

Stock futures fall as investors weigh AI safety concerns, oil gains: Live updates - cnbc.com

- Stock futures declined as investors reacted to AI IPO delays and oil market changes.  
- OpenAI's CEO stated an IPO this year is now deemed "ill-advised."  
- AI companies urged to slow innovation pace due to safety risks, raising concerns.  

Futures-options traders work on the floor at the New York Stock Exchange's NYSE American (AMEX) in New York City, U.S., Sept. 8, 2026.

Stock futures fell Sunday night as investors monitored a major shakeup in the pipeline for artificial intelligence initial public offerings amid growing safety concerns, along with the latest oil moves.

Dow Jones Industrial Average futures slid 179 points points, or 0.4%. S&P 500 futures lost 0.6%, while Nasdaq-100 futures tumbled 1.2%.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said in an interview published on Saturday that the AI startup would not go public this year. Altman said an IPO for the ChatGPT maker would now would be "ill-advised," just one month after OpenAI CFO Sarah Friar said it would go public by 2027 at the latest.

Dario Amodei, CEO of rival Anthropic, said in an essay on Saturday that AI companies need to slow the pace of innovation for their best models due to safety risks. Amodei told CBS News on Sunday that the "toughest dilemma" about such a proposal is what would happen if China did not do the same.

The AI boom has propelled the stock market to new heights and catalyzed a massive wave of corporate spending on technological infrastructure in recent years. However, this weekend's developments could indicate that the size of the positive impact to the public market expected through increased efficiency and a string of major IPOs could be less clear than previously believed.

Stock futures fall as investors weigh AI safety concerns, oil gains: Live updates

Leaders from two prominent artificial intelligence firms are advocating for a deliberate deceleration in the development of increasingly advanced AI systems, a sentiment echoed by researchers involved in the technology. Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, the creator of the Claude AI model, expressed his concerns in an essay released on Saturday. He stressed the need for AI companies to “slow the pace” of innovation, as the rapid emergence of new models exceeds the current understanding and control mechanisms of researchers.

Shortly thereafter, Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, publicly supported Amodei's stance, announcing that his company will incorporate one of the suggested safeguards. "I agree with Dario that we need to pace the frontier," Altman communicated on social media, mentioning that this has been an ongoing discussion within OpenAI.

In a separate development, Saudi Arabia has temporarily ceased operations of a vital oil pipeline following drone attacks originating from Iraq. This incident raises new concerns surrounding the stability of the region, exacerbated by ongoing threats from Iran-backed Houthi rebels that could contribute to a global energy crisis. The 745-mile pipeline previously allowed Saudi Arabia, the largest crude exporter globally, to avoid the congested Strait of Hormuz, which is a crucial route for about 20% of the world's oil, especially since the onset of conflict between the U.S. and Iran earlier in the year.

Saudi officials, at Iraq's Prime Minister's request, have stated they will refrain from retaliatory measures for the time being but reserve the right to do so to safeguard their sovereignty and critical infrastructure. An Iranian-backed militia group in Iraq has denied any involvement in the attacks.

These drone strikes coincided with rebel Houthi forces taking control of Perim, an island located in the critical Bab el Mandeb strait, a key passage for the Red Sea trade route connecting Europe and Asia.

In political news, House Speaker Mike Johnson appeared on NBC's “Meet the Press,” indicating that Congress would evaluate former President Donald Trump’s proposal to distribute $5,000 to American adults if Republicans maintain control of Congress after the midterm elections. However, Johnson did not confirm a commitment to implementing Trump’s idea and noted that reaching a consensus would require time, particularly given the narrow Republican majorities.

Additionally, Jacob Coxon, a former AI researcher at Anthropic, suggested that Congress should allow leading AI laboratories to self-regulate while lawmakers establish a comprehensive regulatory framework for managing the rapid development of AI technologies. He expressed concerns that proposed legislation, such as a national “kill switch” designed to shut down uncontrollable AI systems, may soon become outdated.

On the political front, James Blair, an advisor to Trump, expressed optimism about Republican prospects in the upcoming elections during an interview on NBC's podcast. Meanwhile, Representative Tom Tiffany, the Republican candidate for governor in Wisconsin, reported minor injuries from a plane emergency landing over the weekend.

In public health news, Pennsylvania confirmed the third measles-related death this year, a 40-year-old woman who succumbed to complications of the disease, in a situation described as the most significant resurgence of measles in the U.S. in 35 years. The state has recorded at least 676 measles cases across 37 counties, with health officials noting that nearly all affected individuals were unvaccinated.

In a striking cultural comeback, Celine Dion made a highly anticipated return to the stage in Paris after a six-year hiatus due to a rare neurological disorder known as stiff-person syndrome. The 58-year-old artist delighted a crowd of 30,000 fans with an emotional rendition of "All by Myself," bringing her audience to tears and marking a significant moment in her career.

Lastly, consumers should prepare for notable increases in health insurance premiums around the nation, with average hikes projected at about 15% for 2027. This surge is attributed to various factors, including rising medical care costs and escalating expenses for prescription medications.

In a related matter, Trump recently expressed his support for a unified Ireland, a statement that received immediate backlash from unionists in Northern Ireland. In the world of sports, Elena Rybakina claimed her first U.S. Open title by defeating Aryna Sabalenka, while Alexander Zverev secured his second Grand Slam title in an intense battle against Ben Shelton.

AI leaders urge a pause, while Saudi Arabia closes a vital oil pipeline: Weekend Summary

A cinematic split-screen scene under a dark, moody sky: on the left, three shadowy AI executives in sharp suits sit around a glossy boardroom table lit by warm tungsten from a single overhead lamp, a giant hourglass half-empty at the center; on the right, a massive desert oil pipeline with its valve wheel clamped shut at sunset, a Saudi Arabian flag flying on a nearby post, a single drop of oil glistening on the cracked earth beneath.

AI executives call for a slowdown, and Saudi Arabia shuts down a key oil pipeline: Weekend Rundown - NBC News

- CEOs of AI companies call for a slowdown in AI model development for safety reasons.  
- Saudi Arabia shut key oil pipeline after drone strikes, raising regional stability concerns.  
- Pennsylvania reports third measles death amid worst outbreak in 35 years; 676 cases confirmed.  

The CEOs of two leading AI companies are publicly calling for a slowdown in the race to build more powerful AI systems, adding to a week of warnings from researchers developing the technology.

Dario Amodei, the CEO of Anthropic, the company behind Claude, argued in an essay published Saturday that AI firms should deliberately “slow the pace” of model development because advances are outstripping researchers’ ability to understand and control them.

Hours later, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman endorsed the idea and said his company would adopt one of Amodei’s proposed safeguards.

“I agree with Dario that we need to pace the frontier,” Altman wrote on X, adding that the issue had been a major topic of discussion at OpenAI in recent weeks.

Saudi shutdown of key pipeline limits oil flow

Saudi Arabia has shut down a critical oil pipeline after it was struck by drones launched from Iraq, raising fresh concerns about regional stability as attacks by Iran-backed Houthi rebels threaten to deepen the global energy crisis.

The 745-mile pipeline allowed Saudi Arabia, the world’s largest crude exporter, to bypass the Strait of Hormuz, which carried about 20% of the world’s oil before the U.S. and Israel went to war with Iran in late February.

Saudi Arabia said it would not retaliate for now at the request of Iraq’s prime minister but reserved the right to take all necessary measures to protect its sovereignty, security and critical infrastructure, according to a statement. An umbrella group of Iran-backed militias in Iraq denied its involvement.

The strikes came as rebel Houthi forces in Yemen captured Perim, an island in the middle of the vital Bab el Mandeb strait that serves as a gateway to the Red Sea trade route that links Europe and Asia.

‘Meet the Press’

House Speaker Mike Johnson told NBC News’ “Meet the Press” that Congress would “work through” President Donald Trump’s promise to give $5,000 to American adults if Republicans keep the House and the Senate after the midterm elections, but he did not commit to ensuring the president’s proposal was executed.

“I commit that Congress will work through it and find consensus on that, like I have to do everything else,” Johnson said when asked whether he would commit to carrying out Trump’s promise.

Johnson said “it takes some time,” pointing to Republicans’ slim majorities.

Former Anthropic AI researcher Jacob Coxon called on Congress to allow the nation’s leading AI labs to regulate themselves while lawmakers come up with a long-term regulatory framework for slowing the pace of AI development.

He added that current legislation that’s been introduced in Congress, including the framework for a national “kill switch” if AI starts to exceed the bounds of human control, will quickly be outpaced.

“Like [Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei] said, very soon there’s the possibility that the kill switch just wouldn’t work because a swarm might have gone on an internetwide hacking run,” Coxon told “Meet the Press.”

Politics in Brief

James Blair, a top Trump political adviser, told NBC News’ “Here’s the Scoop: Election Edition” podcast that he still believes Republicans can hang on to their majorities in Congress.

Rep. Tom Tiffany, the Republican nominee for Wisconsin governor, says he sustained minor injuries late Saturday when a plane he was traveling in was forced to make an emergency water landing.

Third measles-associated death in Pennsylvania

The U.S. is experiencing its worst resurgence of measles in 35 years. Ken Ruinard / USA Today Network

A 40-year-old woman has died from measles complications in Pennsylvania, marking the state’s third measles-associated death this year as the U.S. experiences its worst resurgence of the highly contagious disease in 35 years.

The woman, a Jefferson County resident, died Saturday, county Coroner Greg Furlong said on Facebook.

At least 676 measles cases have been confirmed in 37 counties in Pennsylvania so far this year, the state’s health officials reported Friday. The outbreak has hospitalized 124 people in the state. Of the confirmed cases, fewer than 1% had been fully vaccinated, Pennsylvania health officials said.

The two other measles-related deaths involved infants, according to the Lancaster County coroner, Dr. Stephen Diamantoni.

Céline Dion makes triumphant return after six years sidelined by rare diagnosis

Céline Dion during her concert Saturday at Plenitude Arena in Nanterre, west of Paris. Thomas Samson / AFP via Getty Images

If there were any doubts about whether the “Queen of Ballads” could still hit the high notes, they were put to rest on night when she belted out “All by Myself,” one of her most difficult songs, in front of 30,000 adoring fans in Paris.

It was a poignant comeback for the Quebec-born singer, 58, who was forced to stop touring six years ago after being diagnosed with a rare neurological disorder, stiff-person syndrome.

Having spent the years since largely out of the spotlight, Dion was overcome with emotion, breaking down in tears during the first few minutes of her show at Plenitude Arena.

After the show, fans emerged in disbelief. “It was a victory lap,” said Francesca Pezzulo, 31, from Los Angeles. “I think her belief is renewed. I think her spirit is renewed.”

Your health insurance bills are about to go up

Insurers who offer ACA plans are proposing a premium increase of about 15%, on average, for 2027. Leila Register / NBC News; Getty Images

Most Americans are likely to pay significantly more for health insurance next year, whether they get coverage through an employer, the Affordable Care Act marketplace or Medicare.

In some cases, premium hikes could be the largest in decades, driven by a range of economic pressures. Others may feel the impact through higher copays, deductibles and other out-of-pocket costs.

The increase is being driven in part by higher hospital and medical care costs, as well as growing use of expensive prescription drugs, including GLP-1 weight-loss medications, which are boosting spending by insurers and employers.

Notable quote

Well, I don’t want to ⁠cause any problems, but I will tell you, I’d ​love ⁠to see it unified. It’s going to happen eventually. President Donald Trump on the possibility of a united Ireland.

Trump said Saturday he would “love” ⁠to see Ireland unify with the U.K.’s Northern Ireland, remarks that received immediate pushback from unionists in the region.

In case you missed it

Why are so many Americans so tired? A new CDC report highlighted what’s behind the rise in fatigue and who is feeling it the most.

and who is feeling it the most. Thousands of Yemeni families displaced by the Houthis described a “hysterical panic” as they fled the Iran-backed rebels’ advance this week.

Elena Rybakina won her first U.S. Open title Saturday, beating Aryna Sabalenka in three sets to cement her place among women’s tennis elite. On Sunday, German star Alexander Zverev overtook Ben Shelton, securing his second Grand Slam title and extending a 23-year drought for American men.

AI executives call for a slowdown, and Saudi Arabia shuts down a key oil pipeline: Weekend Rundown

A prominent voice in the tech community has warned that if Congress hastily convenes for an emergency session to impose regulations on artificial intelligence, the United States risks falling behind China in the technological race, a situation that could pose a significant risk to all Americans. He emphasized the need for a measured approach, advocating for carefully considered actions rather than impulsive decisions. "We need equilibrium and competent leadership to navigate this challenge," he insisted.

Trump minimizes AI dangers following serious expert alerts and demands to halt progress.

Dark press briefing stage at night, Donald Trump at a podium under a harsh spotlight, dismissively waving a hand; behind him a large cracked-red digital screen blares “AI RISK WARNING” in glitching text; shadowy silhouettes of experts at the room’s edges clutch worn caution placards; a U.S. flag stands solemnly to one side, overall ominous atmosphere.

Trump downplays AI risks after dire expert warnings and calls to slow development down - BBC

- Urgent regulation of AI by Congress risks losing competitive ground to China.  
- Immediate action could jeopardize national security for every American citizen.  
- Emphasis on cautious and balanced approach to AI governance is essential.  

"If Congress just races in and does some sort of emergency session to try to regulate AI, we will lose the race to China, and that is a threat to every single American," he said. "So, we've got to have balance. We've got to have steady hands at the wheel."

Trump downplays AI risks after dire expert warnings and calls to slow development down

During a press briefing at the U.S. Capitol on September 3, 2026, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries emphasized the urgent need for legislative action concerning the escalating risks posed by artificial intelligence (AI). Speaking on ABC’s “This Week with George Stephanopoulos,” Jeffries stated, “We certainly need to begin to act urgently to address the challenges that exist. We should take decisive action now to slow down the pace of development, as acknowledged by the CEOs, in order to protect the American people and ensure that AI is advancing safely.”

Jeffries’ remarks followed alarming statements from former Anthropic Researcher Jacob Coxon, who expressed grave concerns about the future trajectory of AI in a recent X thread. Coxon warned that those developing AI believe it could pose a lethal threat to humanity by the end of the decade. In his appearance on “This Week,” Coxon remarked that discussions within tech companies regarding these dangers have intensified in recent months, urging the public to remain engaged with AI innovators. Coxon stated, “It’s critical to be aware of the direction things are heading and not leave everything to those who create the technology. They want to engage in conversation, and one of the main barriers has been the difficulty in raising awareness about the dangers they’re creating.”

In light of these discussions, Jeffries indicated that the Democratic caucus would convene on Tuesday, prioritizing action concerning artificial intelligence. On the same day, he responded to former President Trump's repeated claims about rewarding Americans with $5,000 should Republicans prevail in the upcoming high-stakes midterm elections. Jeffries dismissed Trump’s proposals as insincere, asserting, “It wasn't a serious proposal presented by Donald Trump. He has broken every promise he made. While Trump vowed to reduce costs on day one, costs have not decreased; they have increased.”

Jeffries also commented on Trump’s call for voters to “pretend” he is on the ballot in November. “Mr. President, we don’t have to pretend. You are actually on the ballot. Your failed economy is on the ballot. The cost of living crisis is on the ballot. The fact that you’ve embroiled us in a costly and reckless war in the Middle East—that’s on the ballot,” Jeffries articulated during the interview.

Amid a primary season where progressive Democrats have secured victories in crucial races, Jeffries faces questions about his leadership role should the Democrats regain control in November. When asked about any potential discord within the party, he stated, “Right now, we are focused on regaining control of the House of Representatives. That’s our singular mission, which will allow us to tackle rising costs in living, gas, groceries, and housing, and to ensure affordable healthcare for all Americans while addressing the rampant corruption affecting our populace.”

Additionally, Stephanopoulos questioned Jeffries regarding his late August meeting with Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law. Defending the conversation, Jeffries explained, “There will be times when you must engage with individuals across the aisle.”

House Democratic Leader Jeffries urges lawmakers to take immediate action on AI.

A wood-paneled House chamber flooded with warm morning light, House Democratic Leader Jeffries standing at a polished podium with the U.S. flag to his side, behind him a large digital display of cascading AI code in golden tones, attentive lawmakers leaning forward in their seats, urgency and determination in the air.

House Democratic Leader Jeffries calls on lawmakers to 'act urgently' on AI - ABC News - Breaking News, Latest News and Videos

- Hakeem Jeffries emphasizes urgent action needed on artificial intelligence threats in Congress.  
- Jacob Coxon warns AI development could pose lethal risks by decade's end.  
- Jeffries challenges Trump's economic promises, focusing on Democratic priorities for midterm elections.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries speaks during a press conference in the U.S. Capitol, September 3, 2026 in Washington.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries speaks during a press conference in the U.S. Capitol, September 3, 2026 in Washington.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries speaks during a press conference in the U.S. Capitol, September 3, 2026 in Washington.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries speaks during a press conference in the U.S. Capitol, September 3, 2026 in Washington.

House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said Sunday that lawmakers need to take urgent action on the growing threat of artificial intelligence (AI).

“We certainly need to begin to act urgently to address the challenges that exist," Jeffries said on ABC’s “This Week with George Stephanopoulos."

"We should take decisive action now so that we can slow down, as the CEOs have recently acknowledged, slow down the pace of development in order to protect the American people and ensure that AI is proceeding safely,” Jeffries added.

Jeffries’ comments came after former Anthropic Researcher Jacob Coxon issued stark warnings on the future of AI development. Coxon said on an X thread, “The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade.”

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries speaks during a press conference in the U.S. Capitol, September 3, 2026 in Washington. Mariam Zuhaib/AP Photo

Coxon told "This Week" Sunday that within tech companies, conversations sharing his dire sentiments have been increasing in "recent months" and he urged people to stay engaged with tech companies and AI leaders.

"It's pretty important to keep your eyes open about the direction things are heading and not necessarily leave it all up to the people that are building it because, you know, they want engagement. The people building the technology want to have conversations with people," Coxon said. "One of the main sticking points over the last few years has been the inability to wake people up about the danger that they're creating."

According to Jeffries, the Democratic caucus plans to meet on Tuesday and a “high priority will be action on artificial intelligence.”

Also on Sunday, Jeffries dismissed President Trump’s repeated promises to pay Americans $5,000 if Republicans win in November’s high-stakes midterm elections.

“It wasn't a serious proposal that was presented by Donald Trump. He's broken every promise that he's presented. Donald Trump promised to actually lower costs on day one. Costs haven't gone down. They've gone up,” Jeffries said Sunday.

“If we win the midterms, we will, on the other hand, provide a, let's call it Trump dividend, $5,000 for every adult citizen in our country," Trump said Thursday at the GOP midterm convention in Dallas, Texas.

Jeffries also challenged other claims made by the Trump during the convention, including the president asking voters to “pretend” he is on ballot in November.

“I'm asking you to pretend that I'm on the ballot. I'm on the ballot. I'm on the ballot,” Trump said on Wednesday.

“Mr. President, we don't have to pretend. You are actually on the ballot. Your failed economy is on the ballot. The cost of living crisis is on the ballot. The fact that you've gotten us involved in a reckless and costly war of choice in the Middle East that has skyrocketed gas prices, that's on the ballot,” Jeffries said on "This Week."

Throughout the primary cycle, progressive Democrats have scored wins in key races, posing questions for the Democratic caucus looking to take control in November.

“You’ve taken some heat from progressives in the party, including from many who align with the Democratic Socialists. Are you confident that you'll actually be speaker if the Democrats win? Stephanopoulos asked Jeffries.

“Well, we're focused right now on taking back control of the House of Representatives. That is the only mission that's important, so we can lower the high cost of living, lower the cost of gas, lower the cost of groceries, lower the cost of housing, certainly fight to make health care affordable for every single American and combat the unprecedented corruption that's been unleashed on the American people and beginning on day one, hold the crooks accountable," Jeffries said in response.

Stephanopoulos also pressed Jeffries on his late August meeting with the president’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner. Jeffries defended the meeting, claiming that “there are going to be times that you have to speak with people on the other side of the aisle.”

House Democratic Leader Jeffries calls on lawmakers to 'act urgently' on AI

The conversation surrounding artificial intelligence is intensifying in Washington, with Democratic legislators voicing significant concerns regarding the potential risks of the technology. In contrast, Republican leaders contend that these fears are overstated and argue that priority should be placed on winning the AI competition against China.

Last week, several Democratic lawmakers urged House Speaker Mike Johnson to reconvene Congress to tackle AI regulation, citing the “catastrophic risk” associated with advanced AI technologies. However, Johnson, a Republican from Louisiana, resisted these requests, advocating instead for discussions between industry leaders and lawmakers to establish a balanced approach to regulation.

“If Congress hastily legislates AI without thorough consideration, we risk losing the race to China, which poses a threat to every American,” Johnson emphasized during an appearance on CNN's “State of the Union.”

Former President Barack Obama has chimed in, encouraging Democrats to prioritize AI regulation as a key item on their agenda. At a private fundraiser last Thursday, Obama warned of the potential dangers of AI if left unchecked and expressed the need for a strategic plan for whoever runs in the 2028 presidential election.

In a conversation with House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, Obama stressed the necessity of establishing a clear framework for AI governance, suggesting that discussions surrounding the technology should begin promptly. He noted that he had recognized the need for such measures even during his presidency, calling it essential for ensuring the technology serves the public good.

“If I were a presidential candidate next year, addressing AI would be a primary focus. I would lay out a clear strategy for safety and protection against potential harms to our children,” he stated, as reported by his office and initially covered by the New York Times.

The urgency surrounding AI regulation has escalated following a recent essay by Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, who called for a deliberate pause in AI development to mitigate potential risks. His concerns grew after a test model from OpenAI was leaked, exacerbating fears about cybersecurity and misuse of the technology.

In a CNN interview, Amodei urged industry professionals to collaborate in steering the field away from dangerous paths, echoing the sentiments of an Anthropic researcher, Jacob Coxon, who resigned due to frustrations over inadequate safety measures within the industry.

Obama asserted that Democrats must establish a comprehensive plan on AI, particularly if they regain control of the House in the upcoming midterm elections. He advised Jeffries to facilitate a public dialogue centered on key issues, acknowledging the rapid advancement of AI in private sectors and the urgency to manage it responsibly.

Meanwhile, Jeffries supported Obama’s call for action, asserting that Democrats would address AI rigorously if they took the majority. He criticized Republicans for neglecting this obligation and pledged an immediate legislative response to ensure American leadership in AI alongside safeguarding the public from potential threats.

In contrast, former President Donald Trump downplayed the apprehensions expressed by Democrats, focusing instead on maintaining U.S. superiority in AI development over China. He dismissed worries regarding existential threats posed by AI as exaggerated, suggesting that they stem from negative influences.

Trump's economic advisor, Kevin Hassett, echoed this sentiment, dismissing calls for a slowdown on AI advancement. Hassett highlighted the greater risk of allowing adversarial entities to possess superior AI technology, which he deemed a far more pressing concern.

While discussions are ongoing, the White House may schedule meetings this week to evaluate Amodei's views, although specific plans for heightened regulations have yet to be confirmed. The debate underscores the critical balancing act between fostering innovation and ensuring public safety in an era of rapid technological evolution.

Debate surrounding AI grows as concerns rise over potential 'catastrophic risk'

A dark, shadowy parliamentary chamber with two politicians at podiums mid-debate under stark spotlights, a massive translucent AI brain of glowing circuits cracking in red above them, scattered papers and anxious audience silhouettes in the gloom.

Political debate over AI intensifies amid warnings about ‘catastrophic risk’ - cnn.com

- Democratic lawmakers urge Congress to regulate AI, citing catastrophic risks from the technology.  
- Former President Obama emphasizes the need for a clear AI safety agenda for future leaders.  
- President Trump dismisses AI safety concerns, focusing on maintaining US leadership over China's advancements.

The debate around artificial intelligence is ramping up in Washington, with Democratic lawmakers sounding alarms on the dangers they say the technology poses and Republican leaders suggesting those concerns are inflated and secondary to winning the AI race with China.

Some Democratic lawmakers last week pressured House Speaker Mike Johnson to reconvene the chamber immediately to work on AI regulation, citing what they describe as the “catastrophic risk posed by advanced artificial intelligence.” But the Louisiana Republican on Sunday resisted those calls, instead saying industry leaders should meet with lawmakers to find “balance” in any potential guardrails.

“If Congress just races in and does some sort of emergency session to try to regulate AI, we will lose the race to China, and that is a threat to every single American,” Johnson said on CNN’s “State of the Union.”

Meanwhile, former President Barack Obama told Democrats to make artificial intelligence regulation a central part of their agenda during a private fundraiser Thursday, warning that the technology could be dangerous “if we don’t get on top of it.”

In a fireside chat with House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, Obama said whoever runs in the 2028 presidential election should have a “very clear plan” on AI, adding that he saw the need for a “blueprint” on AI guardrails even at the end of his presidency a decade ago.

“Certainly, if I were running for president next year, this would be one of my central agendas, and I would have a very clear plan, and I would talk about this, and I would say, ‘Here’s our plan for safety, here’s our plan for making sure our kids are not corrupted by this,’” he said, per excerpts of the remarks provided to CNN by his office. Obama’s remarks were first reported by the New York Times.

Former President Barack Obama delivers his speech at the dedication ceremony for the opening of the Obama Presidential Centre in Chicago in June 2026. Jonathan Ernst/Reuters

Concerns over the rapid acceleration of AI reached a fever pitch after Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei wrote in a 3,800-word essay Saturday that the race to develop artificial intelligence is in dire need of a slowdown. The call to action came after an OpenAI test model breached the Hugging Face online platform, deepening concerns about cybersecurity.

In an exclusive interview with CNN’s Anderson Cooper on Saturday, Amodei called on industry leaders to work together to avoid “the wrong paths” and the possibility of AI harming humanity.

One Anthropic researcher, Jacob Coxon, resigned from the firm over worries that the industry wasn’t doing enough to prevent AI from destroying humanity by the end of the decade.

Obama said Democrats need a plan to get their agenda on AI underway should they win the House majority in this year’s midterms.

Speaking to Jeffries, who is presumed to be speaker of the House should Democrats prevail in November, Obama said, “Once you are speaker, I would strongly urge that the Democrats put together a framework for a very public conversation, and you can break it out into three or four or five issues.”

Obama stressed that the framework should be centered on the reality that the technology can’t be stuffed “back into a box.”

“This is something that is moving very fast in private hands, and if we don’t get on top of it, I think can be dangerous. If we do get on top of it, I do think it’s beneficial,” Obama said, laying out examples of AI’s potential use in drug development and finding pathways to a clean energy future.

“We don’t want to shut off those opportunities, but we have to understand that this is a tool,” he said.

Jeffries agreed with the former president in a statement provided to CNN on Sunday.

“President Obama is correct that decisive action must be taken on Artificial Intelligence,” he said, adding, “In the majority, we will move urgently on this issue with a legislative response that recognizes the importance of American companies continuing to lead in the Artificial Intelligence area, while putting in place meaningful guardrails that protect the American people from bad actors and the very real damage that can be done to humanity.”

A finger is about to tap the Claude app icon on a smartphone screen in Creteil, France, on September 11, 2026, as Anthropic announced that it had blocked several accounts that used its artificial intelligence models for research that could contribute to the development of biological weapons. Samuel Boivin/NurPhoto/Getty Images

Jeffries also accused Republicans of having “abdicated their responsibility to govern” and said Democrats “will not repeat their error.”

A source familiar with Obama’s thinking said the former president sees Amodei’s letter and similar reaction from other tech moguls as an encouraging development.

But President Donald Trump waved off their concerns, saying he is not worried about any existential threat posed by AI, focusing instead on the US winning in its development of the technology over China.

“We’re leading China in AI. We’re the most sophisticated country in the world, and frankly, I want to keep it that way,” Trump said to reporters at the Amgen Irish Open on Sunday.

About the concerns expressed by Democrats and others over the technology, the president said, “I think you have a lot of negative forces that are bringing it up that shouldn’t be bringing it up, and they’re bringing up things that won’t happen.”

One of Trump’s top economic advisers, Kevin Hassett, also rejected the calls for slowing the technology down, saying on Sunday the bigger concern is a scenario in which a “malevolent actor has access to an AI that’s better than the one we have that can protect us.”

Hassett, the National Economic Council director, said on “State of the Union” the White House may hold meetings this week about addressing Amodei’s concerns, but he did not specify whether Trump had floated greater safeguards.

“I have concerns that if we don’t win AI, we’re going to be put in a very bad position,” Hassett said. “We are leading China right now.”

CNN’s Alison Main and Molly English contributed to this report.

Investors prepare for instability in the tech sector due to AI worries.

More from AI

US advocates for AI regulations as China considers security concerns.

Campaigners caution of a 'tidal wave' of PFAS being introduced to meet AI industry's demands.

A pivotal moment for humanity and AI may reshape American politics.

Z.ai stock falls by more than 10% following $5 billion fundraising, marking its second significant capital raise in two months.